I know it’s been a while. Everything has been alright, nothing too eventful. Here is a glimpse of my school life. Below is a copy of my philosophy dialogue that I recently turned in. It was my first philosophy internal assessment.
Philosophy IA Discussion
Hr. 7
Core Themes
Two women are seated in a comfortable room. The lights are soft. One woman sits on the couch while the other holds a clipboard and pen and sits on a revolving chair. The woman on the chair is the counselor; the woman on the couch is attempting to overcome depression.
Counselor: You know, you’re not the first person to be depressed. For thousands of years, humanity has known depression and fought to overcome it. Many did this by attempting to define happiness. How do you define happiness?
Woman: I’m not sure what happiness is. I guess happiness is doing whatever I enjoy doing, like watching TV or reading or playing with my kids.
Counselor: Do you always feel happy when you do those things? You told me before that you’re never happy. That’s what upsets you, isn’t it, that don’t enjoy playing with your children or relaxing?
Woman: I guess you’re right.
Counselor: Aristotle defined happiness as “an activity of the soul.” And by “activity of the soul” he meant virtue. Aristotle called this happiness “eudaimonia.”
Woman: How on earth is that supposed to apply to me? Are you saying that by being ‘virtuous’ I will automatically become happy? I’m not sure I believe that.
Counselor: What I didn’t say, was that Aristotle did not consider happiness to be a mental state. Eudaimonia is the concept of transcendence and thriving.
Woman: But isn’t the mental state of happiness what I want? Isn’t that why I am here, to fix my thoughts? By volunteering, I don’t think I will become automatically happy. What if I’m volunteering to do weeding, which I hate, or… or… I jump in front of a bullet for someone. The act of dying would indeed be virtuous, but I doubt I would be happy while I died.
Counselor: Again, I am afraid you are misunderstanding me. Eudaimonia is translated as happiness, but the more accurate translation would be excellence. Eudaimonia is a way of living your life. When living in such a way as to achieve excellence, you will undoubtedly have many moments of mental happiness. Thus, happiness is just the byproduct of your journey to excellence.
Woman: Okay, I understand your point, but I don’t know how you would hypothetically “live eudaimoniously.” Should I just volunteer at homeless shelters all of the time? Do selfless things? Give all of my money away?
Counselor: Let’s look at this from another philosophic angle. You’re probably familiar with the phrases, “Know thyself,” and “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Both of these sayings originate from ancient Greek philosophies, the first inscribed at the Oracle of Delphi, and the second, spoken by Socrates. Can you control your happiness with your thoughts?
Woman: Well I guess not. That’s why I’m here, isn’t it, because I can’t make myself happy? If I could control my happiness just by thinking or doing volunteer work, I wouldn’t have a problem.
Counselor: Well if we knew ourselves well enough, could we not predict what would make us happy? Couldn’t our internal knowledge be the source of our happiness?
Woman: As I just stated, I don’t think self knowledge is happiness. Your idea is that we still manipulate ourselves, which is just not completely possible. I know what things used to make me happy, but when I do them now, I feel no happiness, only emptiness. Furthermore, isn’t happiness just a byproduct of luck? Should one lose the rest of their family in a horrific car accident, wouldn’t their ‘happiness’ be shattered? Should someone by coincidence run into a handsome man at the library and eventually marry him and live ‘happily ever after’ have that ending through luck?
Counselor: Luck perhaps, but I think that we know that finding that certain someone will bring us joy and that having our family die will bring us grief. Because we know these things, we talk to guys at the library and we wear seatbelts in our cars. We do all that we can to achieve the joy and avoid the grief.
Woman: Before, you talked about knowing yourself. Can you ever truly know yourself? Can you predict your future reactions to future events? I work as a nurse in the hospital, and have seen many times, unexpected emotions. A man becomes paralyzed. He expects extreme despair, and at first he is. But as he adjusts, it may take months or years, but again he finds happiness, which is as close to unpredictable as anything can be.
Counselor: Unpredictable? I think not. The media is saturated with such stories. From these stories we know that we can do it because others could do it.
Woman: Really? Let’s say that’s true. You believe that you will automatically become happy after paralysis because others have done so before. You don’t work at physical therapy and you won’t talk with a counselor. Because he doesn’t do any work to make himself better, he doesn’t become better.
Counselor: (slight laugh) This is quite funny.
Woman: What, you find my ideas comical?
Counselor: No, not at all. It just seems that we have switched places in this argument. I began with the eudaimonia argument saying that to achieve happiness we needed to seek excellence through work and virtue, and now we end with you arguing that same point you scoffed at before, if only in different words.
Woman: (thoughtful) I guess you’re right. But what do you mean, ‘we end?’ Both of our ideas and perceptions have just begun to grow. How can we stop now?
Counselor: Stop? I don’t think this conversation can ever truly end, and I don’t mean the words we use to argue; it is in our own actions that we continue our quest for happiness, be it eudaimonian or not.
Woman: You close our session with deep words. I’m sure I’ll think about these ideas for a while.
Counselor: As will I.
Woman: Well, I’ll see you in two weeks same time, same place, but maybe a different mindset.
Works Cited
Barnes, Jonathon. Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: 2000.
Kazez, Jean. “More Happiness Please.” Philosophy Now 14 Nov 2008 <philosophynow.org>.
Pianalto, Matthew. “Happiness, Virtue, and Tyranny.” Philosophy Now 10 Nov 2008 <philosophynow.org>.